Skip to content

Thoughts before breakfast

February 7, 2013

This picture has nothing to do with the text. But it's cool. Actually--something about chasing rainbows and publishing? Yeah, that works.

This picture has nothing to do with the text. But it’s cool. Actually–something about chasing rainbows and publishing? Yeah, that works.

This post is in response to an interesting discussion over at Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115270351257026959175/posts/SEw6oBxKMwa

Neil Gaiman has compared unlicensed sharing of ebooks to passing a friend a book you really liked–which is historically one of the cornerstones of discovery for authors. I’d like to believe it’s true, that it’s merely an updated, more efficient way of sharing.

But there’s a nasty little voice in my head that says that argument is functionally the same as the one equating an AR-15 with a musket.

Whatever side of either debate one comes down on, I think we have to admit there are instances where a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind. If I can share a book with 100,000 people by clicking a button, we’re talking about both a scale of potential discovery–and a scale of potential revenue–that changes the rules. What’s unclear is who benefits.

Some people want to reward the producers of superior content, either because they “get” the idea that it’s how you encourage the producers to keep producing, or because that’s just their ethical universe. Other people, not so much. The notion that many people value things according to how much they pay for them has not suddenly become a myth. Anything that’s free is going to be treated as disposable by a chunk of the population.

But even e-recidivists can contribute to a work’s success: if someone who won’t pay for squat shares content with those 100,000 aforementioned people, some of them are going to be in the “I’ll pay for what I like” camp. Et voila, discovery.

What we need to come up with is a measure of how well various forms of distribution get stories into the hands of people who will pay for them. Selling a physical object has a very high efficiency rate, but can have lower volumes. Electronic distribution, especially with unauthorized sharing, has a much lower efficiency rate, but can have much higher volumes.

Note the weasel words. As I said, we need to study how well each works…and acknowledge that one size may not fit all. It would not surprise me if the results were notably different for, say, SFF and romance, or fiction as a whole and self-help non-fiction.

In the absence of such information, I have to interpret any claim of inherent superiority for any model as being born from ideological roots, not economic. I don’t belittle or begrudge that: sometimes you simply have to do what you think is right. For my part, I’d like a better idea of likely outcomes before I storm some ramparts or other, banner in hand.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. February 7, 2013 11:13 am

    While I love NG (in a completely platonic, uni-directional, fan-boy way), I also feel that the economic reality of comparing ebook sharing to printbook sharing is different for NYTimes Bestselling Author and Joe Schmo Author.

    Though it is certainly possible (and likely) that studies would reveal it was NYTimes Bestsellers that got pirated most often, that they’re NYTimes Bestsellers to start off with is an indication that the author isn’t going to struggle financially with a little piracy.

    I have a gut feeling that the Joe Schmos who are giving their work away in hopes it will spread their name might actually find there are better ways to get one’s name spread that doesn’t have the same economical impact.

    I know some have suggested with the music industry that musicians can make up the profits lost from mp3 distribution through performances. That’s a little more difficult for the author. Espeecially those authors with limited speaking abilities.

    • February 7, 2013 11:24 am

      As I understand it, the only musical performers who make money from recordings of their songs are the ones who own their own labels, and even they make more from performances…and yeah, not a great model for most writers to emulate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Singing Stars & Shrieking Shadows

Stories and poetry of awe and horror, with reviews and commentary

Nicky Peacock - Author

Published author of YA and adult paranormal romance, horror, urban fantasy short stories, novellas and novels. On this site you'll find writing advice, information on my work, book reviews, author interviews and more...

Often Clueless, Always Shoeless

The Blog of Author Olivia Berrier

SouthernHerf

it's all just a matter of perspective...

Globe Drifting

Global issues, travel, photography & fashion. Drifting across the globe; the world is my oyster, my oyster through a lens.

keithgarrettpoetry

Smile! You’re at the best WordPress.com site ever

Knite Writes

The Official Blog of Therin Knite

Buried Under Books

Tales of a former indie bookseller

Mary Robinette Kowal

The daily journal of a puppeteer and SF author.

Renea Mason

Author of Contemporary and Paranormal Erotic Romance Books - Love Undefined

Words, Words, Words

Write, read, repeat.

charlottecarrendar

~Weaving Words in her Web~

Daily (w)rite

A DAILY RITUAL OF WRITING

Hiking Photography

Beautiful photos of hiking and other outdoor adventures.

Eat, Sleep, Television

Watch as I amaze and astound with opinions about what TV shows I like!

tincantheory

ull new transflations -- Rosetta Stone hypothoses

%d bloggers like this: